Table 4. National evaluation data considered in the Interbull routine evaluation
for dairy production traits (November 2003). Evaluation model summary
			h2
Country	Breed(s)	milk	fat	prot	model
Australia	AYS GUE HOL JER	.25	.25	.25	ST R AM
Belgium #	HOL	.38	.43	.41	MT ML RR TD AM
Canada	AYS	.36	.31	.32	MT ML RR TD AM
	BSW	.41	.36	.38	- " -
	GUE	.42	.36	.39	- " -
	HOL	.38	.35	.36	- " -
	JER	.42	.35	.39	- " -
Czech Republic	HOL SIM	.33	.35	.32	ST R AM
Denmark	AYS HOL RHOL JER	.30	.30	.30	ST R AM
Estonia	HOL	.20	.13	.16	ST ML FR TD AM
Finland	AYS HOL	.44	.33	.33	MT ML RR TD AM
France	BSW HOL RHOL SIM MON	.30	.30	.30	ST R AM
Germany/Austria	AYS HOL JER	.49	.48	.48	ST ML RR TD AM
	BSW	.46	.41	.39	ST ML RR TD AM
	SIM	.43	.38	.34	- " -
Hungary	HOL SIM	.25	.20	.20	ST R AM
Ireland	HOL	.35	.35	.35	ST R AM
Israel	HOL	.43	.52	.41	ST ML AM
Italy	BSW	.31	.23	.29	ST R AM
	HOL	.30	.30	.30	ST R AM
	JER	.30	.30	.30	ST R AM
	SIM	.33	.31	.29	ST AM
Japan	HOL	.33	.31	.29	ST R AM
Netherlands ##	BSW HOL JER SIM	.59	.58	.52	ST ML RR TD AM
New Zealand	AYS BSW GUE HOL JER	.35	.28	.31	ST R AM
Norway	AYS	.26	.19	.21	ST R AM
Poland	HOL	.26	.23	.20	ST ML AM
Rep. South Africa	AYS	.27	.23	.25	MT SL AM
	GUE	.29	.19	.22	- " -
	HOL	.35	.31	.33	- " -
	JER	.30	.27	.30	- " -
Slovenia	BSW	.33	.27	.28	ST R AM
	HOL	.30	.26	.25	- " -
	SIM	.37	.30	.31	- " -
Spain	HOL	.28	.28	.28	ST R AM
Sweden	AYS HOL	.33	.33	.33	ST R AM
Switzerland	BSW RHOL SIM	.36	.34	.34	ST ML FR TD AM
	HOL	.36	.30	.30	ST ML FR TD AM
United Kingdom	AYS GUE HOL JER	.35	.35	.35	ST R AM
United States	AYS GUE HOL	.30	.30	.30	ST R AM
	BSW JER	.35	.35	.35	- " -
# Walloon part of Belgium
## The Netherlands + Flemish part of Belgium
RHOL = Red Holstein; MON = Montbeliarde
AM=Animal Model; SM=Sire/Maternal Grandsire Model
ST ML=Model with lactations as correlated traits;
MT=Multiple-traits; MT SL=Multiple-trait model with single lactation;
TD=Test Day Model; FR=Fixed regression; RR=Random regression