Interbull Routine Genetic Evaluation for Udder Health Traits
August 2004
Introduction
International genetic evaluations for milk somatic cell and clinical mastitis
of bulls from Canada, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, The United Kingdom, The United
States of America, Israel, Italy, Australia, Hungary, Belgium, Japan, Spain and Rep. South Africa were computed in this evaluation. Ayrshire, Brown Swiss,
Guernsey, Holstein and Jersey breed data were included.
Changes in national data
Changes in previous test-run NOT introduced
Changes in Interbull procedures
Data and method of analysis
Data were national genetic evaluations of AI sampled bulls with daughters in
at least 10 herds. For clinical mastitis information to be included, an additional requirement was that bulls had to have at least 50 daughters.
Table 1 presents the amount of data included in this Interbull evaluation.
Table 2 and table 3 gives heritabilities and some additional information on national
evaluations as provided by the participating countries.
Estimated genetic parameters are shown in APPENDIX I and the number of common
bulls are listed in APPENDIX II.
National proofs were first de-regressed within country and then analysed jointly with a linear model including the effects of evaluation country,
genetic group of bull and bull merit. Heritability estimates used in both the de-regression and international evaluation were as in each country's
national evaluation (Table 2 and table
3).
Ancestor-bulls without own proofs were traced back two generations from the oldest bulls with proofs in order to increase across country connections
and account for the effect of selection.
Genetic groups were defined according to unidentified parents by national origin, breed and birth year of the bull and path of selection (sire, maternal
grand-sire, maternal grand-dam). Birth year grouping was by 1-5 year periods. Smaller groups (consisting of less than 30 bulls) were combined.
International genetic evaluations were computed using effective daughter contributions (EDC) as weighting factors.
For each breed, two separate international genetic evaluations were computed. The first included milk somatic cell de-regressed proofs from
individual countries. The second included de-regressed proofs for clinical mastitis
as a direct trait from countries that made this information available and milk somatic cell de-regressed proofs from all other countries. Note that the second
evaluation was not carried out for BSW and GUE since none of the participating countries provided clinical mastitis information.
Genetic correlation estimation procedure
Genetic correlations among countries were estimated using a similar approach as for production traits:
Step 1:
Several subsets of countries were analysed and the highest estimate for a country pair was kept, as per Sigurdsson et al (1996) showing that genetic correlations are not likely to be over-estimated by the method used.
Step 2:
IIn some cases sufficient genetic links between countries may be missing, resulting in unreasonable genetic correlation estimates. If no reasonable correlations could be estimated one of the the following procedures was followed:
a) Estimates from another breed for the country pair were used, but bended towards the actual estimate
b) Estimates from the low end of the correlation distribution were assigned; for milk somatic cell information in different countries these would normally be around .80, for clinical mastitis information in different countries around .40, and between milk somatic cell information and clinical mastitis information in different countries around .35 (estimates between milk somatic cell and clinical mastitis above .80 were considered unrealistic and bended downward).
Step 3:
Since genetic correlation estimates were not derived simultaneously, the full covariance matrix needed to be bended in order to ensure it was positive definite.
Publication of Interbull evaluations
Results were distributed by the Interbull Centre to designated
representatives in each country. The international evaluation file comprised international proofs expressed on the base and unit of each country included
in the analysis. Such records readily provide more information on bull performance in various countries, thereby minimising the need to resort to
conversions.
At the same time, all recipients of Interbull results are expected to honour the agreed code of practice, decided by the Interbull Steering Committee,
and only publish international evaluations on their own country scale. Evaluations expressed on another country scale are confidential and may only
be used internally for research and review purposes.
All recipients are also expected to follow the agreed guidelines for advertising
genetic merit. The guidelines has been distributed to all members and is available on the Interbull homepage (http://www.interbull.org) under
"Publications and Documentation/General information".
Next routine international evaluation
The next routine international evaluation for dairy production, udder health, conformation and longevity traits is scheduled for November 2004. New data for the November routine run should reach the Interbull Centre not later than Tuesday October 26, 2004, 17:00 Central European Time (CET); in any case, the most recently received data will be considered. The target time for distribution of results for internal review to designated representatives, who have signed a confidentiality agreement with the Centre, is Thursday November 4, 2004. Official release date of the results is targeted to be Monday November 8, 2004.
Next test international evaluation
The next test international evaluation for dairy production, conformation and
udder health traits is scheduled for September 2004. The next test evaluation for
direct longevity for the Holstein breed is March 2005. The first test evaluation
for direct longevity (breeds other than Holstein) and calving traits (Holstein only) is
scheduled for September 2004. Countries wishing to enter the system for the first time
or planning to submit new information (modified national evaluation procedure, new
breeds etc) for following routine evaluations must have their data tested in this
test-run.
Deadline for sending data and validation results to the Interbull Centre for the September
2004 test evaluation is September 1, 2004 at 17:00 CET.
Means of result distribution from the Interbull Centre
Electronic exchange of data is probably more efficient
than anything else. Currently most countries in the service have established
internet connections and receive international evaluation results on the day of
their release. Subscribers to the service that do not already has this
option are encouraged to consider it and establish an internet connection and
ftp account. When such accounts are available, please provide their
specifications to the Interbull Centre. Until then, data will be delivered on
CD-ROM's.
For more information about the international genetic evaluation service please contact the Interbull Centre:
address: SLU Box 7023, 750 07 Uppsala, Sweden; fax: +46-18-672648;
e-mail: | Freddy.Fikse_at_hgen.slu.se | Phone: | +46-18-671994 |
Thomas.Mark_at_hgen.slu.se | +46-18-671974 | ||
Jette.Jakobsen_at_hgen.slu.se | +46-18-671955 | ||
Eva.Hjerpe_at_hgen.slu.se | +46-18-672438 | ||
Hossein.Jorjani_at_hgen.slu.se | +46-18-671964 | ||
Jan.Philipsson_at_hgen.slu.se | +46-18-671976 | ||
Dan.Englund_at_hgen.slu.se | +46-18-671968 |